Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCordner, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorEgerton, Thorlene
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Katharine
dc.contributor.authorWijesinghe, Tanya
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T09:54:02Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T09:54:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationCordner, T., Egerton, T., Schubert, K., Wijesinghe, T., & Williams, G. (2020). Ballistic Resistance Training: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness for Improving Mobility in Adults With Neurologic Conditions: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727120
dc.description.abstractObjectives To determine whether ballistic resistance training is feasible, safe, and effective in improving muscle strength, power generation, and mobility in adults with neurologic conditions. Data Sources Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2019 in addition to the reference lists of included articles. Study Selection Articles were independently screened by 2 authors and were included if they were full-text; English-language articles published in a peer-reviewed journal; investigated ballistic resistance training for adults with a neurologic condition; and reported on feasibility, safety, strength, power, or mobility. Data Extraction Two authors independently extracted data. Study quality was assessed using the McMaster critical review form and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Data Synthesis The search identified 1540 articles, with 13 articles describing 9 studies meeting the criteria for inclusion. Five studies were randomized controlled trials and 4 were cohort studies. Ballistic resistance training was feasible and safe with only 1 intervention-related adverse event reported. Findings indicated improvements in strength for hip abduction, leg press, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion, but not for hip flexion, hip extension, knee extension, or ankle plantarflexion. Muscle power generation improved for hip flexion, hip abduction, leg press, knee extension, and knee flexion, but not for ankle plantarflexion. Treatment effect was positive for self-selected walking speed, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-1.38) from 3 studies. However, fastest comfortable walking speed results were inconclusive with a SMD from 4 studies of 0.45 (95% CI, –0.01 to 0.91). Conclusions Ballistic training is safe and feasible for people with a neurologic condition. The effects on muscle strength, power generation, and mobility were found to be positive but not conclusive.en_US
dc.publisherArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectgaiten_US
dc.subjectneurological rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectresistance trainingen_US
dc.subjectsafetyen_US
dc.subjectnevrologiske lidelseren_US
dc.titleBallistic Resistance Training: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness for Improving Mobility in Adults With Neurologic Conditions: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.journalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.023
dc.description.localcodemåsjekkes


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel