Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMalterud, Kirsti
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T09:47:33Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T09:47:33Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationMalterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483–488.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2731331
dc.description.abstractQualitative research methods could help us to improve our understanding of medicine. Rather than thinking of qualitative and quantitative strategies as incompatible, they should be seen as complementary. Although procedures for textual interpretation differ from those of statistical analysis, because of the different type of data used and questions to be answered, the underlying principles are much the same. In this article I propose relevance, validity, and reflexivity as overall standards for qualitative inquiry. I will discuss the specific challenges in relation to reflexivity, transferability, and shared assumptions of interpretation, which are met by medical researchers who do this type of research, and I will propose guidelines for qualitative inquiry.en_US
dc.publisherThe Lanceten_US
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectstandardsen_US
dc.subjectchallengesen_US
dc.subjectguidelinesen_US
dc.subjectinnovasjonen_US
dc.titleQualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelinesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.pagenumber483-488en_US
dc.source.volume358en_US
dc.source.journalThe Lanceten_US
dc.source.issue9280en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
dc.description.localcodemåsjekkes


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel