Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohansen, E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T08:21:53Z
dc.date.available2021-07-08T08:21:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJohansen, E. (2017). The 3-risk approach to pressure ulcer assessment in Norway —safe or a risky business? Wounds, 13(4), 50–54. Hentet fra https://www.wounds-uk.com/journals/issue/450/article-details/3-risk-approach-pressure-ulcer-assessment-norway-safe-risky-businessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2763873
dc.description.abstractSuccessful prevention of Pressure Ulcers (PU) requires that at-risk patients are identified and provided with a package of measures. In Norway, the use of numerical risk assessment tools like Braden, Norton and Waterlow has never been widespread. Instead, a non-numerical approach based on immobility and clinical judgment is recommended by the National Patient Safety Programme to identify those at risk. This article describes the 3-risk approach to risk assessment, its development and whether an even simpler approach could be safe.en_US
dc.publisherWounds UKen_US
dc.subjectat-risk patientsen_US
dc.subjectNorwayen_US
dc.subjectpressure ulcersen_US
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten_US
dc.subjecttrykksåren_US
dc.subjectpasientsikkerheten_US
dc.titleThe 3-risk approach to pressure ulcer assessment in Norway —safe or a risky business?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.pagenumber50-54en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalWounds UKen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record