Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBomhof-Roordink, H.
dc.contributor.authorGartner, F. R.
dc.contributor.authorStiggelbout, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorPieterse, A. H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-17T13:10:33Z
dc.date.available2022-11-17T13:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBomhof-Roordink, H., Gartner, F.R., Stiggelbout, A.M. & Pieterse, A.H. (2019). Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Journals, 19(12).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032468
dc.description.abstractObjectives To (1) provide an up-to-date overview of shared decision making (SDM)-models, (2) give insight in the prominence of components present in SDM-models, (3) describe who is identified as responsible within the components (patient, healthcare professional, both, none), (4) show the occurrence of SDM-components over time, and (5) present an SDM-map to identify SDM-components seen as key, per healthcare setting. Design Systematic review. Eligibility criteria Peer-reviewed articles in English presenting a new or adapted model of SDM. Information sources Academic Search Premier, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published up to and including September 2, 2019. Results Forty articles were included, each describing a unique SDM-model. Twelve models were generic, the others were specific to a healthcare setting. Fourteen were based on empirical data, 26 primarily on analytical thinking. Fifty-three different elements were identified and clustered into 24 components. Overall, Describe treatment options was the most prominent component across models. Components present in >50% of models were: Make the decision (75%), Patient preferences (65%), Tailor information (65%), Deliberate (58%), Create choice awareness (55%), and Learn about the patient (53%). In the majority of the models (27/40), both healthcare professional and patient were identified as actors. Over time, Describe treatment options and Make the decision are the two components which are present in most models in any time period. Create choice awareness stood out for being present in a markedly larger proportion of models over time. Conclusions This review provides an up-to-date overview of SDM-models, showing that SDM-models quite consistently share some components but that a unified view on what SDM is, is still lacking. Clarity about what SDM constitutes is essential though for implementation, assessment, and research purposes. A map is offered to identify SDM-components seen as key. Trial registration PROSPERO registration CRD42015019740en_US
dc.publisherBMJ Journalsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectshared decision makingen_US
dc.subjectshared decision making modelsen_US
dc.subjectutviklingshemmingen_US
dc.subjectbeslutningsstøtteen_US
dc.titleKey components of shared decision making models: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Journalsen_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763
dc.source.articlenumbere031763en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal