Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLugtenberg, M.
dc.contributor.authorZegers-van Schaick, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorWestert, G. P.
dc.contributor.authorBurgers, J. S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T10:13:32Z
dc.date.available2023-01-06T10:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationLugtenberg, M., Zegers-van Schaick, J. M., Westert, G. P. & Burgers, J. S. (2009). Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Science, 4(1), 54.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041493
dc.description.abstractBackground Despite wide distribution and promotion of clinical practice guidelines, adherence among Dutch general practitioners (GPs) is not optimal. To improve adherence to guidelines, an analysis of barriers to implementation is advocated. Because different recommendations within a guideline can have different barriers, in this study we focus on key recommendations rather than guidelines as a whole, and explore the barriers to implementation perceived by Dutch GPs. Methods A qualitative study using six focus groups was conducted, in which 30 GPs participated, with an average of seven per session. Fifty-six key recommendations were derived from twelve national guidelines. In each focus group, barriers to the implementation of the key recommendations of two clinical practice guidelines were discussed. Focus group discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed by using an existing framework of barriers. Results The barriers varied largely within guidelines, with each key recommendation having a unique pattern of barriers. The most perceived barriers were lack of agreement with the recommendations due to lack of applicability or lack of evidence (68% of key recommendations), environmental factors such as organisational constraints (52%), lack of knowledge regarding the guideline recommendations (46%), and guideline factors such as unclear or ambiguous guideline recommendations (43%). Conclusion Our study findings suggest a broad range of barriers. As the barriers largely differ within guidelines, tailored and barrier-driven implementation strategies focusing on key recommendations are needed to improve adherence in practice. In addition, guidelines should be more transparent concerning the underlying evidence and applicability, and further efforts are needed to address complex issues such as comorbidity in guidelines. Finally, it might be useful to include focus groups in continuing medical education as an innovative medium for guideline education and implementation.en_US
dc.publisherImplementation Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectfocus groupen_US
dc.subjectsleep disorderen_US
dc.subjectcontinue medical educationen_US
dc.subjectguideline recommendationen_US
dc.subjectthyroid disorderen_US
dc.subjectimplementeringen_US
dc.subjectretningslinjeren_US
dc.subjectveiledereen_US
dc.titleWhy don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitionersen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.pagenumber54en_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.journalImplementation Scienceen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-54


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal