• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Kroppslig hygiene
  • Bleier til vaksne
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Kroppslig hygiene
  • Bleier til vaksne
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Men, Women, and Children—Current Evidence: Findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence

Buckley, B. S.; Lapitan, M.C.M.
Journal article
Thumbnail
View/Open
Artikkel (182.1Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3086616
Date
2010
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Bleier til vaksne [12]
Original version
Buckley, B. S., & Lapitan, M. C. M. (2010). Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Men, Women, and Children—Current Evidence: Findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology, 76(2), 265–270.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.078
Abstract
Objectives

To summarize existing evidence relating to the prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in order to provide a concise reference source for clinicians, health researchers, and service planners.

Methods

For the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence (4th ICI) world experts identified, collated, and reviewed the best available evidence. Estimates of prevalence from different studies are presented as ranges.

Results

Most studies report some degree of urinary incontinence (UI) in 25-45% of women; 7-37% of women aged 20-39 report some UI; “daily UI” is reported by 9% to 39% of women over 60. Pregnancy, childbirth, diabetes and increased body mass index are associated with an increased risk of UI. Prevalence of UI in men approximately half that in women: UI is seen in 11-34% of older men, with 2-11% reporting daily UI. Surgery for prostate disease is associated with an increased risk. Some 10% of children aged seven, 3% of 11-12 years olds and 1% of 16-17 year olds are not dry at night.

Conclusions

UI is clearly common, but accurate prevalence data have proven difficult to establish because of heterogeneity between studies in terms of methodologies, definitions of UI and populations considered. Future research should use standardized, validated and more readily comparable methods.
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Urology

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit